hot news
Dangers of transvaginal mesh
transvaginal mesh, a mesh made biological or synthetic , originally used for hernia patients , have wreaked havoc in recent years . Without clinical trials , the mesh was described as a cure -all which require pelvic organ prolapse women (POP ) and / or stress urinary inconsistency of effort ( IUE) replacements. In thousands of cases, defectively designed and manufactured meshes have caused irreparable pain and injury.
The increasing numbers of complaints of transvaginal mesh led the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to realize the crisis leading to two alerts and public warnings. The FDA in 2008 issued a Public Health Notification and people also patient information to warn that the insertion of a transvaginal mesh remains a matter of serious concern. Again as more complaints stacked against manufacturers of transvaginal mesh therefore he urged the FDA to issue another advisory and warning in 2011. The government agency reported again people that there are serious complications associated with transvaginal mesh.
The pain and suffering caused by transvaginal mesh
It has become evident that the meshes not only cause emotional pain and suffering to the affected individual, but the entire family as well.
Some of the physical pain and injuries associated with nets found in thousands of women are:
? Dyspareunia? Pain during and after sex
? vaginal scarring or shrink
? Pelvic pain
? Infection
? pain or vaginal bleeding
? drilling bodies
? mesh erosion
In addition, victims have suffered psychological, emotional and financial side effects of transvaginal mesh.
transvaginal mesh lawsuit
The victims have been, in some cases, several surgeries to remove the mesh. In several cases, it becomes impossible to remove even the defected mesh, causing prolonged suffering and injury to the victim. 15,000 transvaginal mesh lawsuits have been filed with the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia. This adds up to thousands of such lawsuits pending in state courts.
Companies and manufacturers of transvaginal mesh, as American Medical Systems, Inc. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. C. R. Bard, Inc. and Boston Scientific have frequently been subject to these demands. The underlying argument in most of the demands of transvaginal mesh manufacturers is that deceive both patients and physicians regarding the dangers associated with the insertion of a mesh. More mesh manufacturers have been accused of fraud and concealing facts from the public that its product could cause debilitating and permanent injuries.
Possibility of a transvaginal mesh lawsuit
If you or someone you know has been the victim of a transvaginal mesh implant, and suffered pain and injury, the legal possibilities available. Miles, as mentioned above, have been presented and filed lawsuits against these companies. In some cases, courts have awarded millions of dollars to those affected.
Christine Scott nine underwent revision surgeries due to injuries from transvaginal mesh manufactured by C. R. Bard. Inc .. She and her husband were awarded $ 5.5 million in damages against the company by a California jury.
Linda Gross, another victim of the transvaginal mesh manufactured by Johnson & Johnson, Inc., underwent 18 operations due to constant pain. He was awarded $ 11.1 million in punitive damages awarded by a jury in New Jersey.
Donna Cisson suffered serious complications after C. R. Bard. Inc. made mesh was implanted in her. Jurors in West Virginia awarded $ 250,000 in compensatory damages and $ 1.75 million in punitive damages, amounting to a prize of $ 2 million.
